一张是“万人空巷”，另一张却是“小猫两三只”，怎么会有这么大的差别？什么时候岛国起了那么大的变化？图片又是“电脑作假”的吗？
其实，“议会民主”岂可“一党独大”？届届“横扫千军”，所向披靡；久而久之，是否就出现了“问题”？在位太久，会有些“不新鲜”的感觉吧？让多几个负责任的反对党议员进入议会，对民主、对人民，或许也是一件好事；人们不必感到惊慌，有关者也不用学诗巫的政客，“未选泪先流”，父子俩在那里装模作样地“欲哭无泪”！（结果是兵败如山倒，双双哭倒在拉让江畔！）
一向“娇生惯养”的选民，也有“怒吼”的一天吗？人们不妨拭目以待！
02.05.2011
Though comparatively the government in question is a bit cleaner but if you put it under the microscope you will find some dirts and germs under the carpet yet. Maybe they don't dare to grab the land which is limited anyway and so are the natural resources which are non-existent. However, some of the business are somehow given to the related firms owned by those in power in order to get better protection and convenience when the processes have to go thru the authority concerned. Cleaner than and smarter than rambut puteh but not right too!
回复删除Personally I think there should be a strong opposition in Singapore too. Lky is senile and he thinks he is the only one who can govern Singapore and I think readers would readily disagree with him. He is not indispensable anyway. Let's hope the opposition can make some headway this time of all times.
回复删除