2009年7月21日星期二

企鹅传情变




醒悟了的企鹅


这里简单转述一下,一则刊登在诗华《花花世界》版有关“企鹅情变”的传奇故事。

美国旧金山动物园养有一双“同志”(或称“断背”?)企鹅,已经同居六年;一只名“胡椒粉”,另一只就叫哈利。这对“夫夫”(两只都是公的)一向恩爱异常,还曾共同孵化出一个“养子”。谁知不久前竟告“情海翻波”,闹出情变!不知怎的,那只花心的哈利又告“变态”,迷恋上新寡的邻居琳达。好个薄情寡义的哈利,狠心抛弃旧爱,搬到隔邻与新欢同居了。

这还不够,新婚“夫妇”(不再是“夫夫”)俩还要故意在“胡椒粉”面前表现得十分亲热;那种恩爱缠绵状,直让“胡椒粉”看在眼里,无限酸楚在心头!“落落寡欢”的它,只好强打起精神,尽量投入团体活动,藉以排遣满怀愁绪!

其实,平心而论,哈利之对“胡椒粉”的“始乱终弃”,该是情有可宥的。想想看,原先的“变态”,再加上这一次的反向“变态”;那不正是数学上“负负得正”的道理吗?这一来,哈利又恢复了企鹅的“正常”生活,正是可喜可贺得很,何错之有?情场失意的“胡椒粉”理该向哈利学习,知“昨非而今是”,重新做只正常的企鹅。

在闭门省思后,人们都希望“胡椒粉”再找到的新欢也会是名符其实的“夏娃”,而不是又缠上另一个“亚当”。阿门!


都说“亚当夏娃”是上帝的杰作,神的旨意?我不信神鬼,但我相信亚当与夏娃确是“天作之合”,无可争议的天成佳偶。过去如此,现在如此,相信未来仍然如此。那些“另类”的,到底只是少数中的少数;要不然,人类将如何繁衍?难道又要靠“人工复制”来“造人”?

什么“同志”、“断背”之类的称谓,只听得人毛骨悚然,全身都起鸡皮疙瘩!有人把这种变态现象归咎于“基因”。即便有部分或是如此,那也只能说是“不幸”,值得同情;却怎么也无法把有异于常态的“变态”,说成“正常”。对此,人们应该可以“容忍”,但却不能把它视为“正常”,如此而已。

企鹅尚有回头日,那自称“万物之灵”的呢?

20.07.2009

3 条评论:

  1. This is not the first time I see you comment on the matter of homosexual tendency etc. I do not actually know very much how people go homosexual and why they engage in such affairs. But since quite a lot of countries in this hemisphere are giving them legal status of their MM or FF marriages , we may need to give them deep and fair judgement from the point of view of humanity and science. In times of yore, people have little knowledge on many things and so we have witch-hunting, tales of foxes inducing males to have sexual intercourses and what not. Now we would rather give the benefit of doubt to the homosexual people and not to follow the old religious tradition of outlawing this and that without going into the matter based on impartial and scientific point of views and studies on the physical and psychological aspects of the subject. Do not jump on the bandwagon that has burned many women accusing them of witchcraft including the heroine of France. True that they are one of the weaker and underprivileged group treated more as outcast, but should you as a democratic fighter and independent thinker do more than pointing an accusing finger too?

    回复删除
  2. 作者回应:

    是谁在那里指手画脚地乱套“高帽子”?谁是“民主斗士”,笔者可曾如此“自诩”过?喜欢“摇笔杆”的人,顶多是“路见不平一声吼”罢了,几时想当什么“斗士”还是“fighter" ?也太过抬举了吧?

    对于“同性恋”问题,你有你的性取向,我有我的看法;什么叫“accusing finger" ? 难道只有你的看法才是最符合新时代的至理“伟论”,别人不同的看法都成了无知的,无理取闹的“指责”?

    正因为我有“独立思考”的能力,我可以随时随意表达我的看法而不必随任何人的“指挥棒”起舞!所谓的“赶时髦,追随潮流”(jump on the band-wagon),真是可笑之至!

    若再有“企鹅情变”那样的传奇故事出现,或许我还会再度“出击”的;有兴趣者,何妨拭目以待?

    石凡

    回复删除
  3. What I mean is not focus too much on trivial matter and not to fall into trap of current trend of feigning holiness while engaging in terrible crime. True that not many people are homosexual and apparently very few are truly such in the real sense of the word but since they are weak and not a strong influence, we may not have to wedge a ware and hue and cry against the underprivileged few. Fight the overpowering overlord sitting on peoples' heads with wealth to much the world's richest few while exploiting the people mercilessly. I must state I am not for and not one of homosexual group nor the slightest interest in that but while I do not like them I still fight for their right to live and survive in their limited space!

    回复删除